Photo credits: David Holt London.
Photo credits: David Holt London.

Immigration and the Demise of Political Trust

An average of 30 percent of the British public have identified immigration as one of their most important concerns since 2003; in recent months, 50 per cent or more have named this as one of the most important issues facing the UK. In many other countries, such public concern about immigration has prompted the rise of the far-right as a significant challenger to established political parties, though the far right does not appear to be a serious challenger in UK general elections, even in the face of increased levels of migration (and despite government promises to reduce it).

Public concern about immigration presents a potentially more serious challenge to the functioning of liberal democracy than simply prompting the rise of the far-right, however, because it undermines public confidence in democratic political institutions and elites. Two key factors are likely to be causing this.

The first of these goes back to the construction of modern liberal democracy, which from its inception has involved a sense of ‘we-feeling’; the modern social welfare state may particularly necessitate a clear notion of society and belonging since it requires significant financial sacrifice for the benefit of others. Post-war immigration may be seen by many as a challenge to widely held conceptualizations of who ‘we’ are and more specifically, where newcomers fit within these conceptualizations. Many have argued that immigration and multiculturalism may create problems for the ‘we-feeling’ that underpins national social democratic political systems (although it must be noted that the evidence on this is somewhat mixed). This demise of the sense of community is likely to include the institutions and elites that are expected to represent and adjudicate between members of the community (i.e., citizens).

The second reason that public concern about immigration undermines confidence in the political system is that citizens are likely to have come to blame the political system as a whole for failing to control immigration. For several decades, citizens in Britain and other European countries have expressed fairly strong reservations about continued migration to their countries. Politicians periodically respond to these concerns by producing policy changes designed to slow the levels of immigration and/or to improve the integration of migrants who are allowed to stay in the country long-term. Opposition parties often promise to ‘get immigration under control’ when governing parties appear to be failing in this policy area. There are, however, countless examples of opposition parties promising the latter in particular, only to fail to have much apparent impact on immigration numbers once in office. This is because the legal and economic requirements in the area of immigration policy mean that it is extremely difficult to reduce immigration to the sorts of levels often promised by politicians without committing human rights violations, violating European Union law, or damaging the domestic economy and public services.

Thus, the main factor that may be contributing to the rising connection between public concern about immigration and distrust in national political institutions and elites is the politicians themselves promising outcomes that are not realistically deliverable. By making and invariably breaking such promises, political elites not only reduce confidence in their own handling of immigration but contribute to the demise of confidence in the national political system as a whole.

This blog was originally published in the OUPblog on 27 January 2016.

About Lauren McLaren

Lauren McLaren

Lauren McLaren is Professor of Comparative Politics and Head of Politics at the University of Glasgow. Her book, Immigration and Perceptions of National Political Systems in Europe (OUP 2015), analyses the impact of immigration and national identity on trust in political institutions and elites in Europe and specifically in Britain. She has written on the topics of public attitudes to immigration, political trust, as well as public attitudes to European integration and to Turkey's European Union membership. Her other research interests include politics in Southern Europe, including Turkey. She has written two research monographs and has also published her research in journals such as World Politics, Journal of Politics, British Journal of Political Science, European Union Politics, European Journal of Political Research , and Social Forces.

Lauren McLaren @ University of Glasgow
 

Check Also

Photo credits: Rijksoverheid.nl

Cabinet Formation and Portfolio Distribution in European Multiparty Systems

Bargaining between political parties over the allocation of cabinet seats in parliamentary coalitions has received ...

Leave a Reply